On Aug 30, 2014 9:55 PM, "Shriramana Sharma" <samj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello. There seem to be lots of questions in various forums re the
> output of btrfs fi df -- especially w.r.t. the usage of the word
> "total". For example see https://community.oracle.com/thread/2459838
>
> I feel it would make the intent clearer if "total" were changed to
> "alloc" or "allocated" (if the short form is felt unclear). It would
> also help people understand the output of regular df on a btrfs system
> since one can understand easier that pre-allocated space would count
> as "used" space as it is not free!
>
> --


Just a user here, but I think that's a GREAT idea. Even after reading
the man page and wiki the current output isn't terribly easy to
understand for the uninitiated. I think "allocated" is a much better
representation of the actual state of the fs (as I understand it).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to