We should update device->bytes_used in the lock context of chunk_mutex, or we would get wrong data.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <mi...@cn.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index 1524b3f..45e0b5d 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -4429,6 +4429,9 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, if (ret) goto error_del_extent; + for (i = 0; i < map->num_stripes; i++) + map->stripes[i].dev->bytes_used += stripe_size; + free_extent_map(em); check_raid56_incompat_flag(extent_root->fs_info, type); @@ -4500,7 +4503,6 @@ int btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, device = map->stripes[i].dev; dev_offset = map->stripes[i].physical; - device->bytes_used += stripe_size; ret = btrfs_update_device(trans, device); if (ret) goto out; -- 1.9.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html