On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 01:39:49 +0800 Anand Jain <anand.j...@oracle.com> wrote:
> > > On 16/09/2014 01:14, Johannes Hirte wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:32:58 +0800 > > Anand Jain <anand.j...@oracle.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> Hi Johannes, > >> > >> Can I have you this tested.. ? Thanks. > >> > >> > >> ------- > >> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c > >> index e9676a4..1224b61 100644 > >> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c > >> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c > >> @@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ static noinline int device_list_add(const char > >> *path, > >> * the btrfs dev scan cli, after FS has been > >> mounted. */ > >> if (fs_devices->opened) { > >> - return -EBUSY; > >> + goto out; > >> } else { > >> /* > >> * That is if the FS is _not_ mounted > >> and if you @@ -566,6 +566,7 @@ static noinline int > >> device_list_add(const char *path, if (!fs_devices->opened) > >> device->generation = found_transid; > >> > >> +out: > >> *fs_devices_ret = fs_devices; > >> > >> return ret; > >> ------- > > > > With this change, it works again without initramfs. > > Thanks. I am bit confused, is there any configuration that is > still not working, even with the above changes. > > Anand At moment, I'm not aware of any. But I will test the remaining systems I have. regards, Johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html