On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 12:53:38 +0200 Bob Marley <bobmar...@shiftmail.org> wrote:
> On 10/10/2014 03:58, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > >> * mount -o recovery > >> "Enable autorecovery attempts if a bad tree root is found at mount > >> time." > > I'm confused why it's not the default yet. Maybe it's continuing to evolve > > at a pace that suggests something could sneak in that makes things worse? > > It is almost an oxymoron in that I'm manually enabling an autorecovery > > > > If true, maybe the closest indication we'd get of btrfs stablity is the > > default enabling of autorecovery. > > No way! > I wouldn't want a default like that. > > If you think at distributed transactions: suppose a sync was issued on > both sides of a distributed transaction, then power was lost on one > side What distributed transactions? Btrfs is not a clustered filesystem[1], it does not support and likely will never support being mounted from multiple hosts at the same time. [1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clustered_file_system -- With respect, Roman
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
