-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/18/2014 1:16 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> If fstab specifies rootfs as UUID, and there are two volumes with
> the same UUID, it’s now ambiguous which one at boot time is the
> intended rootfs. It’s no different than the days of /dev/sdXY where
> X would change designations between boots = ambiguity and why we
> went to UUID.

He already said he has NOT rebooted, so there is no way that the
snapshot has actually been mounted, even if it were UUID confusion.

> So we kinda need a way to distinguish derivative volumes. Maybe
> XFS and ext4 could easily change the volume UUID, but my vague 
> recollection is this is difficult on Btrfs? So that led me to the 
> idea of a way to create an on-the-fly (but consistent) “virtual 
> volume UUID” maybe based on a hash of both the LVM LV and fs
> volume UUID.

When using LVM, you should be referring to the volume by the LVM name
rather than UUID.  LVM names are stable, and don't have the duplicate
uuid problem.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUa2j4AAoJEI5FoCIzSKrwvywH/3yS25MAIwsGfIwBfCrNN5Qo
NlBttcUcrYgOD/nQHEuulHdilWrvz3q6jGwVL9W8MQsHm0Ah5dMatT5e5zr1DSNC
ZqSEXSE8jsYJu99FUWevxO7wtb94ioKa+OF1u0zsaA5yQUdaj5smPqK3iUfskUhs
jE/vsJmws5iBv0dxnZI/6n3YqOB1Qck4PcMItRj8xvZQ0GjARIVw36pgJnmboGfY
vWRmUXnTeLMu9ilHWhqNUIh3lTTUvRdaYoZtTr6eYh9sIntDCegN71WGmO8FfdjP
vXhikg7Yx7FhkhxAl1X2NzM93d7fUSQDeQfTLYLMDbbTV/n2HwcoZ6G2+IQEJnQ=
=3Lv1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to