On 11/26/2014 11:09 AM, Filipe David Manana wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Josef Bacik <jba...@fb.com> wrote:
On 11/26/2014 10:28 AM, Filipe Manana wrote:
If we remove a block group (because it became empty), we might have left
a caching_ctl structure in fs_info->caching_block_groups that points to
the block group and is accessed at transaction commit time. This results
in accessing an invalid or incorrect block group. This issue became
visible
after Josef's patch "Btrfs: remove empty block groups automatically".
So if the block group is removed make sure we don't leave a dangling
caching_ctl in caching_block_groups.
Sample crash trace:
[58380.439449] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at
ffff8801446eaeb8
[58380.439707] IP: [<ffffffffa03f6d05>]
block_group_cache_done.isra.21+0xc/0x1c [btrfs]
[58380.440879] PGD 1acb067 PUD 23f5ff067 PMD 23f5db067 PTE
80000001446ea060
[58380.441220] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
[58380.441486] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq nfsd
auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd fscache sunrpc loop psmouse
processor i2c_piix4 parport_pc parport pcspkr serio_raw evdev i2ccore
thermal_sys microcode button ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom
ata_generic sg sd_mod crc_t10dif crct10dif_generic crct10dif_common
virtio_scsi floppy ata_piix e1000 libata virtio_pci scsi_mod virtio_ring
virtio [last unloaded: btrfs]
[58380.443238] CPU: 3 PID: 25728 Comm: btrfs-transacti Tainted: G W
3.17.0-rc5-btrfs-next-1+ #1
[58380.443238] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
rel-1.7.5-0-ge51488c-20140602_164612-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014
[58380.443238] task: ffff88013ac82090 ti: ffff88013896c000 task.ti:
ffff88013896c000
[58380.443238] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa03f6d05>] [<ffffffffa03f6d05>]
block_group_cache_done.isra.21+0xc/0x1c [btrfs]
[58380.443238] RSP: 0018:ffff88013896fdd8 EFLAGS: 00010283
[58380.443238] RAX: ffff880222cae850 RBX: ffff880119ba74c0 RCX:
0000000000000000
[58380.443238] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff880185e16800 RDI:
ffff8801446eaeb8
[58380.443238] RBP: ffff88013896fdd8 R08: ffff8801a9ca9fa8 R09:
ffff88013896fc60
[58380.443238] R10: ffff88013896fd28 R11: 0000000000000000 R12:
ffff880222cae000
[58380.443238] R13: ffff880222cae850 R14: ffff880222cae6b0 R15:
ffff8801446eae00
[58380.443238] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88023ed80000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[58380.443238] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
[58380.443238] CR2: ffff8801446eaeb8 CR3: 0000000001811000 CR4:
00000000000006e0
[58380.443238] Stack:
[58380.443238] ffff88013896fe18 ffffffffa03fe2d5 ffff880222cae850
ffff880185e16800
[58380.443238] ffff88000dc41c20 0000000000000000 ffff8801a9ca9f00
0000000000000000
[58380.443238] ffff88013896fe80 ffffffffa040fbcf ffff88018b0dcdb0
ffff88013ac82090
[58380.443238] Call Trace:
[58380.443238] [<ffffffffa03fe2d5>] btrfs_prepare_extent_commit+0x5a/0xd7
[btrfs]
[58380.443238] [<ffffffffa040fbcf>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x45c/0x882
[btrfs]
[58380.443238] [<ffffffffa040c058>] transaction_kthread+0xf2/0x1a4
[btrfs]
[58380.443238] [<ffffffffa040bf66>] ?
btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x3d8/0x3d8 [btrfs]
[58380.443238] [<ffffffff8105966b>] kthread+0xb7/0xbf
[58380.443238] [<ffffffff810595b4>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x67/0x67
[58380.443238] [<ffffffff813ebeac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[58380.443238] [<ffffffff810595b4>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x67/0x67
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdman...@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 1 +
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index d3ccd09..7f40a65 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -1277,6 +1277,7 @@ struct btrfs_block_group_cache {
unsigned int ro:1;
unsigned int dirty:1;
unsigned int iref:1;
+ unsigned int has_caching_ctl:1;
Don't do this, just unconditionally call get_caching_control in
btrfs_remove_block_group, then if we get something we can do stuff,
otherwise we can just continue. Thanks,
That's what I initially thought too. However, get_caching_control only
returns us the caching_ctl if block_group->cached ==
BTRFS_CACHE_STARTED, so it's not enough to use it exclusively. The
has_caching_ctl flag is just to avoid holding the semaphore and search
through the list (since block_group->caching_ctl can be NULL but a
caching_ctl point to the block group can be in the list).
Oh God that's not good, we need to change get_caching_control to return
if there is a caching control at all, since the other users want to wait
for the fast caching to finish too. So change that and then use it
unconditionally. I bet this has been causing us the random early ENOSPC
problems. Thanks,
Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
