From: Martin Wilck <mwi...@arcor.de>
This patch fixes the same thing in two different places. First,
the first of the two BUG() tests is just a special case of the
second one and can therefore be omitted. Second, instead of bailing
out with BUG(), just print a reasonable error message and check the
next child.
Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <mwi...@arcor.de>
---
btrfs-debug-tree.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
print-tree.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/btrfs-debug-tree.c b/btrfs-debug-tree.c
index 4c1e835..d7c1155 100644
--- a/btrfs-debug-tree.c
+++ b/btrfs-debug-tree.c
@@ -73,13 +73,23 @@ static void print_extents(struct btrfs_root *root, struct
extent_buffer *eb)
btrfs_node_blockptr(eb, i),
size,
btrfs_node_ptr_generation(eb, i));
- if (btrfs_is_leaf(next) &&
- btrfs_header_level(eb) != 1)
- BUG();
if (btrfs_header_level(next) !=
- btrfs_header_level(eb) - 1)
- BUG();
- print_extents(root, next);
+ btrfs_header_level(eb) - 1) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "EXTENT TREE CORRUPTION detected at
%llu, "
+ "slot %d pointing at %llu.\n"
+ "\tExpected child level: %d, found %d\n"
+ "\tExpected tree/transid: %llu/%llu,"
+ " found %llu/%llu\n",
+ eb->start, i, next->start,
+ btrfs_header_level(eb) - 1,
+ btrfs_header_level(next),
+ (unsigned long long)btrfs_header_owner(eb),
+ (unsigned long long)btrfs_header_generation(eb),
+ (unsigned long long)btrfs_header_owner(next),
+ (unsigned long long)
+ btrfs_header_generation(next));
+ } else
+ print_extents(root, next);
free_extent_buffer(next);
}
}
diff --git a/print-tree.c b/print-tree.c
index 70a7acc..6769e20 100644
--- a/print-tree.c
+++ b/print-tree.c
@@ -1066,13 +1066,23 @@ void btrfs_print_tree(struct btrfs_root *root, struct
extent_buffer *eb, int fol
(unsigned long long)btrfs_header_owner(eb));
continue;
}
- if (btrfs_is_leaf(next) &&
- btrfs_header_level(eb) != 1)
- BUG();
if (btrfs_header_level(next) !=
- btrfs_header_level(eb) - 1)
- BUG();
- btrfs_print_tree(root, next, 1);
+ btrfs_header_level(eb) - 1) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "TREE CORRUPTION detected at %llu, "
+ "slot %d pointing at %llu.\n"
+ "\tExpected child level: %d, found %d\n"
+ "\tExpected tree/transid: %llu/%llu,"
+ " found %llu/%llu\n",
+ eb->start, i, next->start,
+ btrfs_header_level(eb) - 1,
+ btrfs_header_level(next),
+ (unsigned long long)btrfs_header_owner(eb),
+ (unsigned long long)btrfs_header_generation(eb),
+ (unsigned long long)btrfs_header_owner(next),
+ (unsigned long long)
+ btrfs_header_generation(next));
+ } else
+ btrfs_print_tree(root, next, 1);
free_extent_buffer(next);
}
}
--
1.7.3.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
