On 12/11/2014 09:31 AM, Dongsheng Yang wrote: > When function btrfs_statfs() calculate the tatol size of fs, it is calculating > the total size of disks and then dividing it by a factor. But in some usecase, > the result is not good to user.
I Yang; during my test I discovered an error: $ sudo lvcreate -L +10G -n disk vgtest $ sudo /home/ghigo/mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/vgtest/disk Btrfs v3.17 See http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org for more information. Turning ON incompat feature 'extref': increased hardlink limit per file to 65536 fs created label (null) on /dev/vgtest/disk nodesize 16384 leafsize 16384 sectorsize 4096 size 10.00GiB $ sudo mount /dev/vgtest/disk /mnt/btrfs1/ $ df /mnt/btrfs1/ Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/vgtest-disk 9428992 1069312 8359680 12% /mnt/btrfs1 $ sudo ~/btrfs fi df /mnt/btrfs1/ Data, single: total=8.00MiB, used=256.00KiB System, DUP: total=8.00MiB, used=16.00KiB System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=0.00B Metadata, DUP: total=1.00GiB, used=112.00KiB Metadata, single: total=8.00MiB, used=0.00B GlobalReserve, single: total=16.00MiB, used=0.00B What seems me strange is the 9428992KiB of total disk space as reported by df. About 600MiB are missing ! Without your patch, I got: $ df /mnt/btrfs1/ Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/vgtest-disk 10485760 16896 8359680 1% /mnt/btrfs1 > Example: > # mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/vdf1 /dev/vdf2 -d raid1 > # mount /dev/vdf1 /mnt > # dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/zero bs=1M count=1000 > # df -h /mnt > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/vdf1 3.0G 1018M 1.3G 45% /mnt > # btrfs fi show /dev/vdf1 > Label: none uuid: f85d93dc-81f4-445d-91e5-6a5cd9563294 > Total devices 2 FS bytes used 1001.53MiB > devid 1 size 2.00GiB used 1.85GiB path /dev/vdf1 > devid 2 size 4.00GiB used 1.83GiB path /dev/vdf2 > a. df -h should report Size as 2GiB rather than as 3GiB. > Because this is 2 device raid1, the limiting factor is devid 1 @2GiB. > > b. df -h should report Avail as 0.97GiB or less, rather than as 1.3GiB. > 1.85 (the capacity of the allocated chunk) > -1.018 (the file stored) > +(2-1.85=0.15) (the residual capacity of the disks > considering a raid1 fs) > --------------- > = 0.97 > > This patch drops the factor at all and calculate the size observable to > user without considering which raid level the data is in and what's the > size exactly in disk. > After this patch applied: > # mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/vdf1 /dev/vdf2 -d raid1 > # mount /dev/vdf1 /mnt > # dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/zero bs=1M count=1000 > # df -h /mnt > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/vdf1 2.0G 1.3G 713M 66% /mnt > # df /mnt > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > /dev/vdf1 2097152 1359424 729536 66% /mnt > # btrfs fi show /dev/vdf1 > Label: none uuid: e98c1321-645f-4457-b20d-4f41dc1cf2f4 > Total devices 2 FS bytes used 1001.55MiB > devid 1 size 2.00GiB used 1.85GiB path /dev/vdf1 > devid 2 size 4.00GiB used 1.83GiB path /dev/vdf2 > a). The @Size is 2G as we expected. > b). @Available is 700M = 1.85G - 1.3G + (2G - 1.85G). > c). @Used is changed to 1.3G rather than 1018M as above. Because > this patch do not treat the free space in metadata chunk > and system chunk as available to user. It's true, user can > not use these space to store data, then it should not be > thought as available. At the same time, it will make the > @Used + @Available == @Size as possible to user. > > Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > Changelog: > v1 -> v2: > a. account the total_bytes in medadata chunk and > system chunk as used to user. > b. set data_stripes to the correct value in RAID0. > > fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 13 ++---------- > fs/btrfs/super.c | 56 > ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------- > 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > index a84e00d..9954d60 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > @@ -8571,7 +8571,6 @@ static u64 __btrfs_get_ro_block_group_free_space(struct > list_head *groups_list) > { > struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group; > u64 free_bytes = 0; > - int factor; > > list_for_each_entry(block_group, groups_list, list) { > spin_lock(&block_group->lock); > @@ -8581,16 +8580,8 @@ static u64 > __btrfs_get_ro_block_group_free_space(struct list_head *groups_list) > continue; > } > > - if (block_group->flags & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 | > - BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 | > - BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP)) > - factor = 2; > - else > - factor = 1; > - > - free_bytes += (block_group->key.offset - > - btrfs_block_group_used(&block_group->item)) * > - factor; > + free_bytes += block_group->key.offset - > + btrfs_block_group_used(&block_group->item); > > spin_unlock(&block_group->lock); > } > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c > index 54bd91e..40f41a2 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c > @@ -1641,6 +1641,8 @@ static int btrfs_calc_avail_data_space(struct > btrfs_root *root, u64 *free_bytes) > u64 used_space; > u64 min_stripe_size; > int min_stripes = 1, num_stripes = 1; > + /* How many stripes used to store data, without considering mirrors. */ > + int data_stripes = 1; > int i = 0, nr_devices; > int ret; > > @@ -1657,12 +1659,15 @@ static int btrfs_calc_avail_data_space(struct > btrfs_root *root, u64 *free_bytes) > if (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0) { > min_stripes = 2; > num_stripes = nr_devices; > + data_stripes = num_stripes; > } else if (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1) { > min_stripes = 2; > num_stripes = 2; > + data_stripes = 1; > } else if (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10) { > min_stripes = 4; > num_stripes = 4; > + data_stripes = 2; > } > > if (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP) > @@ -1733,14 +1738,17 @@ static int btrfs_calc_avail_data_space(struct > btrfs_root *root, u64 *free_bytes) > i = nr_devices - 1; > avail_space = 0; > while (nr_devices >= min_stripes) { > - if (num_stripes > nr_devices) > + if (num_stripes > nr_devices) { > num_stripes = nr_devices; > + if (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0) > + data_stripes = num_stripes; > + } > > if (devices_info[i].max_avail >= min_stripe_size) { > int j; > u64 alloc_size; > > - avail_space += devices_info[i].max_avail * num_stripes; > + avail_space += devices_info[i].max_avail * data_stripes; > alloc_size = devices_info[i].max_avail; > for (j = i + 1 - num_stripes; j <= i; j++) > devices_info[j].max_avail -= alloc_size; > @@ -1772,15 +1780,13 @@ static int btrfs_calc_avail_data_space(struct > btrfs_root *root, u64 *free_bytes) > static int btrfs_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct kstatfs *buf) > { > struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(dentry->d_sb); > - struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super = fs_info->super_copy; > struct list_head *head = &fs_info->space_info; > struct btrfs_space_info *found; > u64 total_used = 0; > + u64 total_alloc = 0; > u64 total_free_data = 0; > int bits = dentry->d_sb->s_blocksize_bits; > __be32 *fsid = (__be32 *)fs_info->fsid; > - unsigned factor = 1; > - struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv = &fs_info->global_block_rsv; > int ret; > > /* > @@ -1792,38 +1798,20 @@ static int btrfs_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct > kstatfs *buf) > rcu_read_lock(); > list_for_each_entry_rcu(found, head, list) { > if (found->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA) { > - int i; > - > - total_free_data += found->disk_total - found->disk_used; > + total_free_data += found->total_bytes - > found->bytes_used; > total_free_data -= > btrfs_account_ro_block_groups_free_space(found); > - > - for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES; i++) { > - if (!list_empty(&found->block_groups[i])) { > - switch (i) { > - case BTRFS_RAID_DUP: > - case BTRFS_RAID_RAID1: > - case BTRFS_RAID_RAID10: > - factor = 2; > - } > - } > - } > + total_used += found->bytes_used; > + } else { > + /* For metadata and system, we treat the total_bytes as > + * not available to file data. So show it as Used in df. > + **/ > + total_used += found->total_bytes; > } > - > - total_used += found->disk_used; > + total_alloc += found->total_bytes; > } > - > rcu_read_unlock(); > > - buf->f_blocks = div_u64(btrfs_super_total_bytes(disk_super), factor); > - buf->f_blocks >>= bits; > - buf->f_bfree = buf->f_blocks - (div_u64(total_used, factor) >> bits); > - > - /* Account global block reserve as used, it's in logical size already */ > - spin_lock(&block_rsv->lock); > - buf->f_bfree -= block_rsv->size >> bits; > - spin_unlock(&block_rsv->lock); > - > buf->f_bavail = total_free_data; > ret = btrfs_calc_avail_data_space(fs_info->tree_root, &total_free_data); > if (ret) { > @@ -1831,8 +1819,12 @@ static int btrfs_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct > kstatfs *buf) > mutex_unlock(&fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex); > return ret; > } > - buf->f_bavail += div_u64(total_free_data, factor); > + buf->f_bavail += total_free_data; > buf->f_bavail = buf->f_bavail >> bits; > + buf->f_blocks = total_alloc + total_free_data; > + buf->f_blocks >>= bits; > + buf->f_bfree = buf->f_blocks - (total_used >> bits); > + > mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex); > mutex_unlock(&fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex); > > -- gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijackATinwind.it> Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
