On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 03:35:09PM +0100, Merlijn Wajer wrote: [snip] > Attached are the two patches generated with git format-patch. I am aware > that this may not be required format for submitting patches -- but > please give me some time to get used to the etiquette. :-)
Thanks, there are minor things that I won't bother to point out to occasional contributors and fix them myself. The only formal requirement is the Signed-off-by tag, you can find the description eg. here http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/Documentation/SubmittingPatches#L358 > Please let me know if musl-libc (or any other libc) is a supported > platform, and if so, if and how I can improve on said patches. I'm not aware of non-glibc users, but I don't see any problem to add support for more libc implementations. However, I won't regularly verify that it builds so it might break. Seems that only standardized library calls are used in btrfs-progs so any kind of support is probably going to be satisfied by #ifdefs. Your patches are simple so I'll try to schedule them to some 3.18.x update. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
