On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 03:07:32PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: add regression test for remount with > thread_pool resized > From: gux.fnst <gux.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> > To: <fste...@vger.kernel.org> > Date: 2014年09月17日 18:02 > >Hi, > > > > Could anyone help to review this patch? Thanks! > > > >Regards, > >Xing Gu > > > >On 05/30/2014 04:52 PM, Xing Gu wrote: > >>Regression test for resizing 'thread_pool' when remount the fs. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Xing Gu <gux.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> > >>--- > >> tests/btrfs/055 | 55 > >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> tests/btrfs/055.out | 1 + > >> tests/btrfs/group | 1 + > >> 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+) > >> create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/055 > >> create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/055.out > >> > >>diff --git a/tests/btrfs/055 b/tests/btrfs/055 > >>new file mode 100755 > >>index 0000000..0a0dd34 > >>--- /dev/null > >>+++ b/tests/btrfs/055 > >>@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ > >>+#!/bin/bash > >>+# FS QA Test No. btrfs/055 > >>+# > >>+# Regression test for resizing 'thread_pool' when remount the fs. > >>+# > IMHO, it would be better to add the commit number for the regression > and the fix commit number > (Filipe Manana always does the great job). > > For reference: > Regresssion commit: 08a9ff3264181986d1d692a4e6fce3669700c9f8 (All my fault) > Fix commit: 800ee2247f483b6d05ed47ef3bbc90b56451746c
That belongs in the commit message, not the test description. -Dave. -- Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
