oh, and sorry to bump myself. but is raid10 *ever* more redundant in btrfs-speak than raid1? I currently use raid1 but i know in mdadm speak raid10 means you can lose 2 drives assuming they aren't the "wrong ones", is it safe to say with btrfs / raid 10 you can only lose one no matter what? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
- I need to P. are we almost there yet? sys.syphus
- Re: I need to P. are we almost there ye... sys.syphus
- Re: I need to P. are we almost ther... Hugo Mills
- Re: I need to P. are we almost ... sys.syphus
- Re: I need to P. are we alm... Hugo Mills
- Re: I need to P. are we almost ther... Chris Murphy
- Re: I need to P. are we almost ... ashford
- Fwd: I need to P. are we al... Jose Manuel Perez Bethencourt
- Re: I need to P. are we alm... Phillip Susi
- Re: I need to P. are w... ashford
- Re: I need to P. a... Phillip Susi
- Re: I need to ... ashford