On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 13:18 -0600, sys.syphus wrote: > I start it. I check it and its like 2% done > Several hours its stopped and the re-balance clearly didn't finish > because I can see one member of the array has a fraction of the usage > of the others. Dmesg shows no errors. > > Thoughts? should start it again in the foreground with verbosity or > something? any logs i can check other than dmesg?
It doesn't sound like anything is going wrong here, but to be sure can you please paste the output of `btrfs fi show` and `btrfs fi df` run on the filesystem mountpoint? One thing to note is that Btrfs's "RAID1" mode isn't actually RAID1, but it rather writes only 2 copies of the data. If you have an odd number of disks, this will lead to having varying usages on different devices. > dmesg only shows similar to below > > [342210.304169] BTRFS info (device dm-4): relocating block group > ##### flags 17 > [342219.191141] BTRFS info (device dm-4): found 129 extents > [342233.029425] BTRFS info (device dm-4): found 129 extents > [342235.434779] BTRFS info (device dm-4): relocating block group > ##### flags 17 > [342252.264736] BTRFS info (device dm-4): found 67 extents > [342266.630318] BTRFS info (device dm-4): found 67 extents > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux- > btrfs" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Calvin Walton <calvin.wal...@kepstin.ca> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
