On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:21:43PM +0000, Filipe Manana wrote:
> Currently this test fails on 2 situations:
>
> 1) The scratch device supports trim/discard. In this case any modern
> version of mkfs.btrfs outputs a message (to stderr) informing that
> a trim is performed, which the golden output doesn't expect:
>
> btrfs/017 - output mismatch (see
> /git/xfstests/results//btrfs/017.out.bad)
> --- tests/btrfs/017.out 2015-01-06 11:14:22.730143144 +0000
> +++ /git/xfstests/results//btrfs/017.out.bad 2015-01-14
> 22:33:01.582195719 +0000
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> QA output created by 017
> +Performing full device TRIM (100.00GiB) ...
> wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 0
> XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
> 4096 4096
> ...
> (Run 'diff -u tests/btrfs/017.out
> /git/xfstests/results//btrfs/017.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
>
> So like others tests do, just redirect mkfs' standard error.
>
> 2) On platforms with a page size greater than 4Kb. At the moment btrfs
> doesn't support a node/leaf size smaller than the page size, but it
> supports a larger one. So use the max supported node size (64Kb) so
> that the test runs on any platform currently supported by Linux.
>
> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdman...@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dste...@suse.cz>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
