On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:53:08PM +0800, Gui Hecheng wrote:
> The following patch:
>       btrfs: remove empty fs_devices to prevent memory runout
> 
> introduces @valid_dev_root aiming at recording @btrfs_device objects that
> have corresponding block devices with btrfs.
> But if a block device is broken or unplugged, no one tells the
> @valid_dev_root to cleanup the "dead" objects.
> 
> To recycle the memory occuppied by those "dead"s, we could rely on
> the shrinker. The shrinker's scan function will traverse the
> @valid_dev_root and trys to open the devices one by one, if it fails
> or encounters a non-btrfs it will remove the "dead" @btrfs_device.

I don't see why shrinker is used here.

linux.git/linux/shrinker.h:

"A callback you can register to apply pressure to ageable caches."

How is guaranteed that it will take action at the right time?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to