From: Zhao Lei <zhao...@cn.fujitsu.com>

int alloc_chunk is never used in this function, remove it.

Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhao...@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index a684086..765e72a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -3679,7 +3679,7 @@ int btrfs_check_data_free_space(struct inode *inode, u64 
bytes)
        struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(inode)->root;
        struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = root->fs_info;
        u64 used;
-       int ret = 0, committed = 0, alloc_chunk = 1;
+       int ret = 0, committed = 0;
 
        /* make sure bytes are sectorsize aligned */
        bytes = ALIGN(bytes, root->sectorsize);
@@ -3707,7 +3707,7 @@ again:
                 * if we don't have enough free bytes in this space then we need
                 * to alloc a new chunk.
                 */
-               if (!data_sinfo->full && alloc_chunk) {
+               if (!data_sinfo->full) {
                        u64 alloc_target;
 
                        data_sinfo->force_alloc = CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE;
-- 
1.8.5.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to