The end_slot variable actually matches the number of pointers in the
node and not the last slot (which is 'nritems - 1'). Therefore in order
to check that the current slot in the for loop doesn't match the last
one, the correct logic is to check if 'i' is less than 'end_slot - 1'
and not 'end_slot - 2'.
Fix this and set end_slot to be 'nritems - 1', as it's less confusing
since the variable name implies it's inclusive rather then exclusive.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdman...@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
index 9936421..6d67f32 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
@@ -1645,14 +1645,14 @@ int btrfs_realloc_node(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
parent_nritems = btrfs_header_nritems(parent);
blocksize = root->nodesize;
- end_slot = parent_nritems;
+ end_slot = parent_nritems - 1;
- if (parent_nritems == 1)
+ if (parent_nritems <= 1)
return 0;
btrfs_set_lock_blocking(parent);
- for (i = start_slot; i < end_slot; i++) {
+ for (i = start_slot; i <= end_slot; i++) {
int close = 1;
btrfs_node_key(parent, &disk_key, i);
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ int btrfs_realloc_node(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
other = btrfs_node_blockptr(parent, i - 1);
close = close_blocks(blocknr, other, blocksize);
}
- if (!close && i < end_slot - 2) {
+ if (!close && i < end_slot) {
other = btrfs_node_blockptr(parent, i + 1);
close = close_blocks(blocknr, other, blocksize);
}
--
2.1.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
