For anyone stumbling across this thread:

For my example, all was cleaned up by using the btrfs scrub:

btrfs scrub start /mountpoint


No data lost.

Good luck,
Martin


On 25/03/15 09:38, Martin wrote:

> 
> Is that btrfs system formatted with a previous kernel (pre-
> skinny-metadata) and is now being used with a kernel that newly has
> skinny-metadata enabled by default?...
> 
> 
> I've stumbled across a bug/change/patch listed for a mixed pre/post
> skinny-metadata whereby you get to see lots of csum errors in the logs...
> 
> For one 16TB btrfs raid1 system that brought things down to read-only...
> 
> 
> I'm now on kernel 3.18.9, and Btrfs v3.18.2. Presently copying the
> latest data onto a backup before trying a scrub! :-)
> 
> LOTs of:
> 
> kernel: parent transid verify failed on 5992676900864 wanted 70743 found
> 70709
> kernel: parent transid verify failed on 5992676900864 wanted 70743 found
> 70709
> kernel: BTRFS info (device sdj): no csum found for inode 50675726 start
> 16384
> kernel: BTRFS info (device sdj): csum failed ino 50675726 off 0 csum
> 42383870 expected csum 0
> kernel: BTRFS info (device sdj): csum failed ino 50675726 off 4096 csum
> 815939273 expected csum 0
> 
> and variations seen.
> 
> (Or advice for that one welcomed! ;-) )


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to