On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Martin <m_bt...@ml1.co.uk> wrote: > > Anyone with any comments on how well duperemove performs for TB-sized > volumes?
Took many hours but less than a day for a few TB - I'm not sure whether it is smart enough to take less time on subsequent scans like bedup. > > Does it work across subvolumes? (Presumably not...) As far as I can tell, yes. Unless you pass a command-line option it crosses filesystem boundaries and even scans non-btrfs filesystems (like /proc, /dev, etc). Obviously you'll want to avoid that since it only wastes time and I can just imagine it trying to hash kcore and such. Other than being less-than-ideal intelligence-wise, it seemed effective. I can live with that in an early release like this. -- Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
