Currently this test uses the system btrfs-image. If there isn't a
btrfs-image on $PATH, the test fails. The test should be using the
locally compiled btrfs-image, not the system one.
Good catch.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com>

Thanks,
Qu
---

diff --git a/tests/fsck-tests/012-leaf-corruption/test.sh
b/tests/fsck-tests/012-leaf-corruption/test.sh
index 4db4710..98e3185 100755
--- a/tests/fsck-tests/012-leaf-corruption/test.sh
+++ b/tests/fsck-tests/012-leaf-corruption/test.sh
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ generate_leaf_corrupt_no_data_ext()
      echo "generating leaf_corrupt_no_data_ext.btrfs-image" >> $RESULTS
      tar xJf ./no_data_extent.tar.xz || \
          _fail "failed to extract leaf_corrupt_no_data_ext.btrfs-image"
-    btrfs-image -r test.img.btrfs-image $dest || \
+    $TOP/btrfs-image -r test.img.btrfs-image $dest || \
          _fail "failed to extract leaf_corrupt_no_data_ext.btrfs-image"

      # leaf at 20832256 contains no regular data extent, clear its csum to
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to