Dan Merillat posted on Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:47:29 -0400 as excerpted: > Hopefully this is sufficiently paranoid, tested with PATH_MAX length > symlinks, existing files, insufficient permissions, dangling symlinks. I > think I got the coding style correct this time, I'll fix and resend if > not. > > Includes a trivial fix from my metadata patch, the documentation got > lost in the merge.
Thanks for all this. I've only had to use restore once and hopefully won't be using it again in the near future, but having it restore the metadata and symlinks as well would surely have made the experience easier. There's a lot of people going to benefit from these patches over time as btrfs gains usage and the inevitable breakage happens to some of those filesystems. =:^/ -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
