On Fri, 05 Jun 2015 09:08:37 -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
>> which conflicts with Filipe's patch on Tuesday called "Btrfs: check
>> pending chunks when shrinking fs to avoid corruption":
>>
>> + if (contains_pending_extent(trans, device, &start, len)) {
>>
>> since trans (returned from start_transaction()) is a handle, not
>> the tx itself.
>>
>> ISTM that it should now pass trans->transaction instead..or
>> something.
>
> Yep. That's how you'd resolve that merge. The trans->transaction
> pointer will be valid for the life of the handle.
Good - that's what I've done locally for my branches. Thanks for
confirming. Good to know that I can still make sense of things.
It was more of a question/heads-up since it's not completely unheard of
for warnings to go unnoticed.. :)
cheers
Holger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
