On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:26:11AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > I agree with that. I'm still not convinced that adding all the kernel > > code to repair the data is justified, compared to the block-level > > redundancy alternatives. > > Totally agree with this. > That's why we have support for RAID1/5/6/10. > > I also hate to add complexity to kernel codes, especially when the scrub > codes are already quite complex. > > But in fact, my teammate Zhao Lei is already doing some work to make > scrub codes clean and neat.
Doing cleanups is a good thing regardless of new features, please don't hesitate to post them even if we do not agree to implement the partial csum/repair. I'm not against adding the partial csums & repair, but at the moment I'm not convinced. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
