On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 9:44 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferro...@gmail.com> wrote: > 3. See the warnings about doing block level copies and LVM snapshots of > BTRFS volumes, the same applies to using it on DRBD currently as well (with > the possible exception of remote DRBD nodes (ie, ones without a local copy > of the backing store) (in this case, we need to blacklist backing devices > for stacked storage (I think the same issue may be present with BTRFS on a > MD based RAID1 set).
I've been using BTRFS on top of DRBD for several years now, what specifically am I meant to avoid? I have 6 drives mirrored across a local network, this is done with DRBD. At any one time only a single server has the 6 drives mounted with btrfs. Is this a ticking time bomb? -- Gareth Pye - blog.cerberos.id.au Level 2 MTG Judge, Melbourne, Australia "Dear God, I would like to file a bug report" -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
