error handling logic behaves differently with or without CONFIG_PRINTK defined, since there are two copies of the same function which a bit of different logic
One, when CONFIG_PRINTK is defined, code is __btrfs_std_error(..) { :: save_error_info(fs_info); if (sb->s_flags & MS_BORN) btrfs_handle_error(fs_info); } and two when CONFIG_PRINTK is not defined, the code is __btrfs_std_error(..) { :: if (sb->s_flags & MS_BORN) { save_error_info(fs_info); btrfs_handle_error(fs_info); } } I doubt if this was intentional ? and appear to have caused since we maintain two copies of the same function and they got diverged with commits. Now to decide which logic is correct reviewed changes as below, 533574c6bc30cf526cc1c41bde050c854a945efb Commit added two copies of this function cf79ffb5b79e8a2b587fbf218809e691bb396c98 Commit made change to only one copy of the function and to the copy when CONFIG_PRINTK is defined. To fix this, instead of maintaining two copies of same function approach, maintain single function, and just put the extra portion of the code under CONFIG_PRINTK define. This patch just does that. And keeps code of with CONFIG_PRINTK defined. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.j...@oracle.com> --- fs/btrfs/super.c | 27 +++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c index c389c13..56c0174 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c @@ -130,7 +130,6 @@ static void btrfs_handle_error(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) } } -#ifdef CONFIG_PRINTK /* * __btrfs_std_error decodes expected errors from the caller and * invokes the approciate error response. @@ -140,7 +139,9 @@ void __btrfs_std_error(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, const char *function, unsigned int line, int errno, const char *fmt, ...) { struct super_block *sb = fs_info->sb; +#ifdef CONFIG_PRINTK const char *errstr; +#endif /* * Special case: if the error is EROFS, and we're already @@ -149,6 +150,7 @@ void __btrfs_std_error(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, const char *function, if (errno == -EROFS && (sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) return; +#ifdef CONFIG_PRINTK errstr = btrfs_decode_error(errno); if (fmt) { struct va_format vaf; @@ -166,6 +168,7 @@ void __btrfs_std_error(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, const char *function, printk(KERN_CRIT "BTRFS: error (device %s) in %s:%d: errno=%d %s\n", sb->s_id, function, line, errno, errstr); } +#endif /* Don't go through full error handling during mount */ save_error_info(fs_info); @@ -173,6 +176,7 @@ void __btrfs_std_error(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, const char *function, btrfs_handle_error(fs_info); } +#ifdef CONFIG_PRINTK static const char * const logtypes[] = { "emergency", "alert", @@ -212,27 +216,6 @@ void btrfs_printk(const struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, const char *fmt, ...) va_end(args); } - -#else - -void __btrfs_std_error(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, const char *function, - unsigned int line, int errno, const char *fmt, ...) -{ - struct super_block *sb = fs_info->sb; - - /* - * Special case: if the error is EROFS, and we're already - * under MS_RDONLY, then it is safe here. - */ - if (errno == -EROFS && (sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) - return; - - /* Don't go through full error handling during mount */ - if (sb->s_flags & MS_BORN) { - save_error_info(fs_info); - btrfs_handle_error(fs_info); - } -} #endif /* -- 2.4.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html