Le 2015-09-22 10:51, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
[92098.842261] Call Trace:
[92098.842277] [<ffffffffc035a5d8>] ? read_extent_buffer+0xb8/0x110
[btrfs]
[92098.842304] [<ffffffffc0396d00>] ? btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x70
[btrfs]
[92098.842329]  [<ffffffffc039af3d>]
btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x28d/0x5a0 [btrfs]

Would you please show the code of it?
This one seems to be another stupid bug I made when rewriting the
framework.
Maybe I forgot to reinit some variants or I'm screwing memory...

(gdb) list *(btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x28d)
0x97f6d is in btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker (fs/btrfs/ctree.h:2760).
2755
2756 static inline void btrfs_disk_key_to_cpu(struct btrfs_key *cpu, 2757 struct btrfs_disk_key
*disk)
2758    {
2759            cpu->offset =e64_to_cpu(disk->offset);
2760            cpu->type =isk->type;
2761            cpu->objectid =e64_to_cpu(disk->objectid);
2762    }
2763
2764 static inline void btrfs_cpu_key_to_disk(struct btrfs_disk_key
*disk,
(gdb)


Does it makes sense ?
So it seems that the memory of cpu key is being screwed up...

The code is be specific thin inline function, so what about other stack?
Like btrfs_qgroup_rescan_helper+0x12?

Thanks,
Qu
Oh, I forgot that you can just change the number of
btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x28d to smaller value.
Try +0x280 for example, which will revert to 14 bytes asm code back,
which may jump out of the inline function range, and may give you a
good hint.

Or gdb may have a better mode for inline function, but I don't know...

Actually, "list -" is our friend here (show 10 lignes before the last src output)

(gdb) list *(btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x28d)
0x97f6d is in btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker (fs/btrfs/ctree.h:2760).
2755
2756    static inline void btrfs_disk_key_to_cpu(struct btrfs_key *cpu,
2757 struct btrfs_disk_key *disk)
2758    {
2759            cpu->offset = le64_to_cpu(disk->offset);
2760            cpu->type = disk->type;
2761            cpu->objectid = le64_to_cpu(disk->objectid);
2762    }
2763
2764 static inline void btrfs_cpu_key_to_disk(struct btrfs_disk_key *disk,
(gdb) list -
2745 struct btrfs_disk_key *key)
2746    {
2747 write_eb_member(eb, h, struct btrfs_free_space_header, location, key);
2748    }
2749
2750    /* struct btrfs_disk_key */
2751 BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(disk_key_objectid, struct btrfs_disk_key,
2752                             objectid, 64);
2753 BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(disk_key_offset, struct btrfs_disk_key, offset, 64); 2754 BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(disk_key_type, struct btrfs_disk_key, type, 8);
(gdb) list -
2735
2736 static inline void btrfs_free_space_key(struct extent_buffer *eb, 2737 struct btrfs_free_space_header *h, 2738 struct btrfs_disk_key *key)
2739    {
2740 read_eb_member(eb, h, struct btrfs_free_space_header, location, key);
2741    }
2742
2743 static inline void btrfs_set_free_space_key(struct extent_buffer *eb, 2744 struct btrfs_free_space_header *h,
(gdb)

Lots of inline funcs and macros it seems.

--
Stéphane.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to