On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferro...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2015-09-24 17:07, Sjoerd wrote: >> >> Maybe a silly question for most of you, but the wiki states to always try >> to >> use the latest kernel with btrfs. Which one would be best: >> - 4.2.1 (currently latest stable and matches the btrfs-progs versioning) >> or >> - the 4.3.x (mainline)? >> >> Stable sounds more stable to me(hence the name ;) ), but the mainline >> kernel >> seems to be in more active development? >> > Like Hugo said, 4.2.1 is what you want right now. In general, go with the > highest version number that isn't a -rc version (4.3 isn't actually released > yet, IIRC they're up to 4.3-rc2 right now, and almost at -rc3) (we should > probably be specific like this on the wiki). >
I'll just say that my btrfs stability has gone WAY up when I stopped following this advice and instead followed a recent longterm. Right now I'm following 3.18. There were some really bad corruption issues in 3.17/18/19 that burned me, and today while considering moving up to 4.1 I'm still seeing a lot of threads about issues during balance/etc. I still run into the odd issue with 3.18, but not nearly to the degree that I used to. Now, I would stick with a recent longterm. The older longterms go back to a time when btrfs was far more experimental. Even 3.16 probably has a lot of issues that are fixed in 3.18. That said, if you do run into an issue on a longterm kernel nobody around here is likely to be able to help you much unless you can reproduce it on the most recent stable kernel. Just tossing that out as an alternative opinion. Right now I'm sticking with 3.18, but I'm interested in making the 4.1 switch once issues with that seem to have died down. -- Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
