On Wednesday 30 Sep 2015 15:48:16 Chandan Rajendra wrote: > The patches posted along with this cover letter are cleanups made > during the developement of subpagesize-blocksize patchset. I believe > that they can be integrated with the mainline kernel. Hence I have > posted them separately from the subpagesize-blocksize patchset. > > I have testsed the patchset by running xfstests on ppc64 and > x86_64. On ppc64, some of the Btrfs specific tests and generic/255 > fail because they assume 4K as the filesystem's block size. I have > fixed some of the test cases. I will fix the rest and mail them to the > fstests mailing list in the near future. > > Changes from V3: > Two new issues have been been fixed by the patches, > 1. Btrfs: prepare_pages: Retry adding a page to the page cache. > 2. Btrfs: Return valid delalloc range when the page does not have > PG_Dirty flag set or has been invalidated. > IMHO, The above issues are also applicable to the "page size == block > size" scenario but for reasons unknown to me they aren't seen even > when the tests are run for a long time. >
I accidently added the RFC tag to the patchset. Please ignore the V4 patchset. I will post the V5 without the RFC tag. -- chandan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
