Sam,
On 10/03/2015 11:50 PM, sam tygier wrote:
Currently BTRFS allows you to make bad choices of data and
metadata levels. For example -d raid1 -m raid0 means you can
only use half your total disk space, but will loose everything
if 1 disk fails. It should give a warning in these cases.
Nice test case. however the way we calculate the impact of
lost device would be per chunk, as in the upcoming patch -set.
PATCH 1/5] btrfs: Introduce a new function to check if all chunks a
OK for degraded mount
The above patch-set should catch the bug here. Would you be able to
confirm if this patch is still needed Or apply your patch on top of
it ?
Thanks, Anand
This patch is a follow up to
[PATCH v2] btrfs-progs: check metadata redundancy
in order to cover the case of using balance to convert to such
a set of raid levels.
A simple example to hit this is to create a single device fs,
which will default to single:dup, then to add a second device and
attempt to convert to raid1 with the command
btrfs balance start -dconvert=raid1 /mnt
this will result in a filesystem with raid1:dup, which will not
survive the loss of one drive. I personally don't see why the tools
should allow this, but in the previous thread a warning was
considered sufficient.
Changes in v2
Use btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures()
Signed-off-by: Sam Tygier <samtyg...@yahoo.co.uk>
From: Sam Tygier <samtyg...@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 16:43:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: Check metadata redundancy on balance
When converting a filesystem via balance check that metadata mode
is at least as redundant as the data mode. For example give warning
when:
-dconvert=raid1 -mconvert=single
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 6fc73586..40247e9 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -3584,6 +3584,12 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_balance_control *bctl,
}
} while (read_seqretry(&fs_info->profiles_lock, seq));
+ if (btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(bctl->meta.target) <
+
btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(bctl->data.target)) {
+ btrfs_info(fs_info,
+ "Warning: metatdata has lower redundancy than data\n");
+ }
+
if (bctl->sys.flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_CONVERT) {
fs_info->num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures = min(
btrfs_calc_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(fs_info),
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
