On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 04:13:19PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 04:53:31PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > + if (S_ISDIR(inode_in->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode_out->i_mode)) > > > + return -EISDIR; > > > + if (!S_ISREG(inode_in->i_mode) || !S_ISREG(inode_out->i_mode)) > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > > > I thought we were moving to -EINVAL for wrong file types? > > > > Though, perhaps "I've also prepared a btrfs patch for this and clone" from > > the > > earlier thread about generic/157 wasn't referring to /this/ patch. :) > > > > In any case, I'm ok with EINVAL, and I haven't heard any objections to > > changing -EOPNOTSUPP -> -EINVAL when trying to reflink/dedupe/whatever > > non-file non-dir fds. > > I'm fine with with EINVAL - not sure why I ended up with EOPNOTSUP, > probably because 157 is already failing as in general the errors for > something in the VFS vs a specific ioctl handler are just too different.
Ok, will have respun fixes for 157/158 soon. --D -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
