On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:42 AM, Marc Haber <mh+linux-bt...@zugschlus.de> wrote: > And this is really something to be proud of? I mean, this is a file > system that is part of the vanilla linux kernel, not marked as > experimental or something, and you're still concerned about file > systems that were made a year ago? This is a new experience for me.
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/Documentation/filesystems/btrfs.txt?id=refs/tags/v4.4.4 "Btrfs is under heavy development, and is not suitable for any uses other than benchmarking and review. The Btrfs disk format is not yet finalized." I thought the 2nd sentence was removed a long time ago but I'm seeing it in the current branch and 4.1.y. Is this a bug? -- Chris Murphy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
