On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:08:56AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 03:23:41PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > > btrfs failed to mount small fs on ppc64 host with error ENOSPC, even > > creating such small fs succeeded, then generic/027 consumed all free > > space on root fs not on SCRATCH_DEV and test harness cannot create tmp > > files and continue other tests. > > > > Though I think it's a btrfs bug, it's still worth preventing this > > situation from happening in the harness, as such tests usually aim to > > exercise fs on ENOSPC conditions, there's no point to continue if the > > small fs is not mounted. > > I think the btrfs bug should be fixed. At minimum, the workaround to > see if the filesytem can be mounted should be in btrfs's > implementation of scratch_mkfs_sized....
OK, I'll add workaround in _scratch_mkfs_sized. Thanks for reviewing! Eryu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
