On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 05:02:38PM +0100, Filipe Manana wrote:
> It's not serious if it doesn't have all the proper error handling
> and etc, it's just something for debugging purposes.
I'm slowly trying to remove static checker warnings so that we can
detect real bugs. People sometimes leave little messages for me in
their code because they know I will review the new warning:
foo = kmalloc();
/* error handling deliberately left out */
It make me quite annoyed because it's like "Oh. No if we added error
handling that would take 40 extra bytes of memory! Such a waste!" But
we could use instead use___GFP_NOFAIL instead. Or BUG_ON(!foo)". I
have gotten distracted. What was the question again?
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
