On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 6:34 AM, Qu Wenruo <quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > Ping? > > Cc: Chris and David > > It seems that this fix is missing in 4.6 merge window. > Or did I miss something?
4.5-rc7: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/4/695 > > Thanks, > Qu > > > Filipe Manana wrote on 2016/03/03 09:10 +0000: >> >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: >>> >>> fdmanana posted on Wed, 02 Mar 2016 15:49:38 +0000 as excerpted: >>> >>>> When looking for orphan roots during mount we can end up hitting a >>>> BUG_ON() (at root-item.c:btrfs_find_orphan_roots()) if a log tree is >>>> replayed and qgroups are enabled. >>> >>> >>> This should hit 4.6, right? Will it hit 4.5 before release? >> >> >> It's not the first time you do a similar question, and if it's >> targeted at me, all I can tell you is I don't know. It's the >> maintainers (Chris, Josef, David) who decide when to pick patches and >> for which releases. >> >>> >>> Because I wasn't sure of current quota functionality status, but this bug >>> obviously resets the counter on my ongoing "two kernel cycles with no >>> known quota bugs before you try to use quotas" recommendation. >> >> >> You shouldn't spread such affirmation with such a level of certainty >> every time a user reports a problem. >> There are many bugs affecting the last 2 to 3 releases, but there are >> also many bugs present since btrfs was added to the linux kernel tree, >> and many others present for 2+ years, etc. >> >>> >>> Meanwhile, what /is/ current quota feature status? Other than this bug, >>> is it now considered known bug free, or is more quota reworking and/or >>> bug fixing known to be needed for 4.6 and beyond? >>> >>> IOW, given that two release cycles no known bugs counter, are we >>> realistically looking at that being 4.8, or are we now looking at 4.9 or >>> beyond for reasonable quota stability? >> >> >> I don't know. I generally don't look actively look at qgroups, and I'm >> not a user either. >> You can only take conclusions based on user bug reports. Probably >> there aren't more bugs for qgroups than there are for send/receive or >> even non-btrfs specific features for example. >> >>> >>> -- >>> Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. >>> "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- >>> and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman >>> >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in >>> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> >> >> >> > > -- Filipe David Manana, "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
