From: Qu Wenruo <quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com> The last user of num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures is barrier_all_devices(). But it's can be easily changed to new per-chunk degradable check framework.
Now btrfs_device will have two extra members, representing send/wait error, set at write_dev_flush() time. And then check it in a similar but more accurate behavior than old code. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 13 +++++-------- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 6 +++++- fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 4 ++++ 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c index 4f91a049fbca..9ad3667f5e71 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c @@ -3496,8 +3496,6 @@ static int barrier_all_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *info) { struct list_head *head; struct btrfs_device *dev; - int errors_send = 0; - int errors_wait = 0; int ret; /* send down all the barriers */ @@ -3506,7 +3504,7 @@ static int barrier_all_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *info) if (dev->missing) continue; if (!dev->bdev) { - errors_send++; + dev->err_send = 1; continue; } if (!dev->in_fs_metadata || !dev->writeable) @@ -3514,7 +3512,7 @@ static int barrier_all_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *info) ret = write_dev_flush(dev, 0); if (ret) - errors_send++; + dev->err_send = 1; } /* wait for all the barriers */ @@ -3522,7 +3520,7 @@ static int barrier_all_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *info) if (dev->missing) continue; if (!dev->bdev) { - errors_wait++; + dev->err_wait = 1; continue; } if (!dev->in_fs_metadata || !dev->writeable) @@ -3530,10 +3528,9 @@ static int barrier_all_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *info) ret = write_dev_flush(dev, 1); if (ret) - errors_wait++; + dev->err_wait = 1; } - if (errors_send > info->num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures || - errors_wait > info->num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures) + if (btrfs_check_degradable(info, info->sb->s_flags) < 0) return -EIO; return 0; } diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index f5fa5f88263c..639ae20cc5e6 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -7105,8 +7105,12 @@ int btrfs_check_degradable(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, unsigned flags) btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures( map->type); for (i = 0; i < map->num_stripes; i++) { - if (map->stripes[i].dev->missing) + if (map->stripes[i].dev->missing || + map->stripes[i].dev->err_wait || + map->stripes[i].dev->err_send) missing++; + map->stripes[i].dev->err_wait = 0; + map->stripes[i].dev->err_send = 0; } if (missing > max_tolerated) { ret = -EIO; diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h index ae9d552c93bf..101e5db2dd63 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h @@ -76,6 +76,10 @@ struct btrfs_device { int can_discard; int is_tgtdev_for_dev_replace; + /* for barrier_all_devices() check */ + int err_send; + int err_wait; + #ifdef __BTRFS_NEED_DEVICE_DATA_ORDERED seqcount_t data_seqcount; #endif -- 2.7.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html