In the new add_extent_rec_nolookup() function, we add bytes_used to
update found bytes accounting.

However there is a typo that we used tmpl->nr, which should be rec->nr.
This will make us to add 1 for data backref, instead the correct size.

Reported-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 cmds-check.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/cmds-check.c b/cmds-check.c
index d59968b..b207f8e 100644
--- a/cmds-check.c
+++ b/cmds-check.c
@@ -4550,7 +4550,7 @@ static int add_extent_rec_nolookup(struct cache_tree 
*extent_cache,
        rec->cache.size = tmpl->nr;
        ret = insert_cache_extent(extent_cache, &rec->cache);
        BUG_ON(ret);
-       bytes_used += tmpl->nr;
+       bytes_used += rec->nr;
 
        if (tmpl->metadata)
                rec->crossing_stripes = check_crossing_stripes(rec->start,
-- 
2.8.0



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to