On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 06:40:54PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 01:33:34PM +0500, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 01:24:44 -0700
> > Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > kernel 4.5.0 rc7
> > > btrfs-progs-4.4.1-1
> > > 
> > > Summary: A new empty mixed block group "-M" filesystem shows up as
> > > 100% full with regular df (gnu coreutils 8.24). Pretty sure this is
> > > not a regression, but no regression testing done.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114281
> > 
> > Just guessing here, but this might be related?
> > 
> >   [PATCH] btrfs: statfs: report zero available if metadata are exhausted
> >   http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg48013.html
> > 
> > Maybe some maths there are wrong in case of a mixed blockgroup filesystem.
> 
> Yes it's caused by the referenced patch.  The statfs has been broken for
> mixed blockgroups but the 100% used on empty filesystem looks weird, so
> it's time to fix the mixed-bg case.

JFYI, fixed by Luis de Bethencourt and patches queued for 4.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to