On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 10:40:02AM -0700, Liu Bo wrote: > > > + printk(KERN_ERR "BTRFS: bytes_used is too small %llu\n", > > > + btrfs_super_bytes_used(sb)); > > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > > + } > > > + if (btrfs_super_stripesize(sb) != 4096) { > > > > This is too strict. The stripesize is unused, but we not force it to be > > 4k, a multiple of nodesize/sectorsize should be enough. > > Hmm, in fact stripesize is used in find_free_extent(), > > find_free_extent() { > ... > search_start = ALIGN(offset, root->stripesize); > ... > } > > and in open_ctree(), > > open_ctree() { > ... > stripesize = btrfs_super_stripesize(disk_super); > ... > tree_root->stripesize = stripesize; > ... > } > > btrfs_read_roots() { > ... > btrfs_read_tree_root() --> __setup_root(..., tree_root->stripesize, > ...) > } > > Thus, this stripesize has to be sectorsize at least.
Yes, and must be power of two because of ALIGN for now. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html