On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 03:19:52PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > Hi, Chris, Josef and David, > > As merge window for v4.7 is coming, it would be good to hear your ideas > about the inband dedupe. > > We are addressing the ENOSPC problem which Josef pointed out, and we believe > the final fix patch would come out at the beginning of the merge > window.(Next week) > > > If it's fine, would you please consider to merge the in-memory backend > patchset for v4.7 as an experimental feature? > > > Most of the patch won't be changed from v10 patchset, only ENOSPC fix will > be updated, and ioctl patchset will introduce a new Kconfig option of "btrfs > experimental features" for inband dedupe. > (With explain about unstable ioctl/on-disk format for experimental features) > > > If you are all OK to merge inband dedupe in-memory backend, I'll prepare the > new v11 patchset for this merge.
We have to balance the part where we really want the features to come in, and we want to lower the load on you to continue porting them. But, I really do agree that we need strong test suites included with every major feature like this. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
