On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:29:29AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > @@ -5542,6 +5606,10 @@ long btrfs_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int > > return btrfs_ioctl_get_fslabel(file, argp); > > case BTRFS_IOC_SET_FSLABEL: > > return btrfs_ioctl_set_fslabel(file, argp); > > Would you mind me to add a new kernel config "Btrfs experimental > features-> dedupe ioctl" for case like dedupe and further experimental > btrfs features? > > The BTRFS_DEBUG seems quite odd for me. > Although in-band dedupe is quite good at exposing bugs of > backref/qgroup/delayed_refs, but I still think it's not a debug tool. > > So I hope to use "BTRFS_EXPERIMENTAL_DEDUPE_IOCTL" and add corresponding > Kconfig interfaces.
The point was not to add new config options, but if you find _DEBUG odd we can rethink the "hide it under config option" approach. The alternate way is to get the code into a good shape and add it to for-next. I don't want to track yet another set of branches with the too experimental stuff. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
