Ivan P wrote on 2016/05/19 18:54 +0200:
Not sure why I was so fixated on installing it - thanks for reminding.
I was able to run it, but it fails:
===========================
# ./btrfsck --repair --clear-space-cache -p /dev/sda
enabling repair mode
Clearing all free space cache
btrfs unable to find ref byte nr 812846673920 parent 0 root 1 owner
Error output here means btrfsck find the free space cache inode and its
data extent, but failed to delete the backref.
In that case, the only successfully cleaned space cache will be commited
to disk, and the deletion failure won't be commited to disk.
Would please run "btrfs check --readonly" on the image after clear space
cache and paste the output?
I'm a little interested in what the root problem is.
If it's just a normal backref mismatch problem, it's my patch to blame
as it's too restrict to handle such error. (but for a good safety reason)
If that's the case, I can add some option to allow clear cache to be a
little more aggressive.
And it's better to paste "btrfs-debug-tree -t 1" and "btrfs-debug-tree
-t 2" on your btrfs image for better debugging.
Such output won't leak much personal info, except the subvolume name.
And feel free to fuzz the subvolume name.
1050 offset 0
ERROR: failed to remove backref for disk bytenr 812846673920
ERROR: failed to clear free space cache
transaction.h:41: btrfs_start_transaction: Assertion `root->commit_root` failed.
btrfs check[0x4437ee]
btrfs check(close_ctree_fs_info+0x213)[0x445ab3]
btrfs check(cmd_check+0x638)[0x42b718]
btrfs check(main+0x7b)[0x40fbdb]
/usr/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf1)[0x7fe4ebe1a741]
btrfs check(_start+0x29)[0x40fcd9]
===========================
I also tried running it WITHOUT --repair first, as well as ONLY with
--repair, followed by --clearcache and same thing happened.
--clear-space-cache implies --repair, but override dangerous repair
behavior and only do space cache clean things.
So without or without --repair, it's the same.
I must add that I feel cheated by the "-p" option, it's more of a
"print heartbeat" than "print progress" IMHO :p
Thanks for the -p option, clear space cache doesn't support progress
report yet.
I'll add them in next version.
Thanks,
Qu
@David Sterba: you're welcome.
Regards,
Ivan.
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:00 AM, Qu Wenruo <quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
Not familiar about the problem, but you don't really need to install the
patch.
You can just execute '<your btrfs-progs source dir>/btrfsck' directly to
call the new fsck.
And there is still some time before the patch is merged, there is really no
need to install.
Thanks,
Qu
Ivan P wrote on 2016/05/17 20:12 +0200:
Thank you, however I can't seem to be able to compile that snapshot, I'm
getting
===========================
/usr/bin/install -c -m644 -d 64-btrfs-dm.rules
/home/myuser/aur/btrfs-progs-git/pkg/btrfs-progs-git/usr/lib/udev/rules.d
/usr/bin/install: cannot create directory ‘64-btrfs-dm.rules’: File exists
Makefile:400: recipe for target 'install' failed
make: *** [install] Error 1
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package()
===========================
Just to make sure I wasn't screwing up somewhere, I tried the
btrfs-progs-git AUR package and I'm getting the same thing.
It's not only me, however: according to [1] it could be that this
commit has introduced it: [2]
Regards,
Ivan.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/btrfs-progs-git/
[2]
http://repo.or.cz/btrfs-progs-unstable/devel.git?a=commit;h=ebe5b1cc7885027521db3c1d16d84bd54cc1321b
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 5:56 AM, Qu Wenruo <quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com>
wrote:
Also to Ivan P, the initial reporter of the problem.
Now "btrfsck --clear-cache" should help you to prevent kernel warning on
free space cache problem.
Thanks,
Qu
Qu Wenruo wrote on 2016/05/17 11:47 +0800:
The patchset can be also fetched from github, just in case mail list
blocks the last patch, which contains binary file.
https://github.com/adam900710/btrfs-progs.git fsck_clear_cache
Just as describe in the first patch, btrfs kernel "clear_cache" mount
option can't rebuild all free space cache, due to the design of free
space cache.
(Although I pretty like the idea to delay the load of free space cache,
as it hugely reduce the mount time of large fs)
So this makes users to report error in mail list, complaining
"clear_cache" doesn't wipe the annoying kernel warning on corrupted free
space cache.
Since kernel can't handle it, and user consider it more like an error,
we'd better handle it like an error, to fix it in btrfs check.
So this patchset adds the ability to clear free space cache, and add
test case for it.
The clear procedure is different from kernel, it will remove all free
space cache inodes and its contents(with backrefs), and set
cache_generation of super block to -1.
So there will be no free space cache at all and kernel will be happy
with that.
This patch also enhances btrfs_previous_item() to use min_objectid to
return as early as possible.
Lu Fengqi (1):
btrfs-progs: tests: add 020-bad-free-space-cache
Qu Wenruo (3):
btrfs-progs: corrupt-block: Add ability to corrupt free space cache
file
btrfs-progs: ctree: return earlier for btrfs_previous_item
btrfs-progs: fsck: Add support to clear free space cache
Documentation/btrfs-check.asciidoc | 8 ++
btrfs-corrupt-block.c | 124
++++++++++++++++++++-
cmds-check.c | 58 +++++++++-
ctree.c | 2 +
free-space-cache.c | 124
+++++++++++++++++++++
free-space-cache.h | 4 +
.../020-bad-free-space-cache/default_case.raw.xz | Bin 0 -> 164068
bytes
tests/fsck-tests/020-bad-free-space-cache/test.sh | 16 +++
8 files changed, 334 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
tests/fsck-tests/020-bad-free-space-cache/default_case.raw.xz
create mode 100755 tests/fsck-tests/020-bad-free-space-cache/test.sh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
