On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 01:14:13PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:


On 05/27/2016 11:42 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
I'm getting errors from btrfs fi show -d, after the very last round of
device replaces.  A little extra debugging:

bytenr mismatch, want=4332716032, have=0
ERROR: cannot read chunk root
ERROR reading /dev/vdh
failed /dev/vdh

Which is cute because the very next command we run fscks /dev/vdh and
succeeds.

Checked the code paths both btrfs fi show -d and btrfs check,
both are calling flush during relative open_ctree in progs.

However the flush is called after we have read superblock. That
means the read_superblock during 'show' cli (only) will read superblock
without flush, and 'check' won't, because 011 calls 'check' after
'show'. But it still does not explain the above error, which is
during open_ctree not at read superblock. Remains strange case as
of now.

It's because we're just not done writing it out yet when btrfs fi show is run.
I think replace is special here.


Also. I can't reproduce.


I'm in a relatively new test rig using kvm, which probably explains why
I haven't seen it before.  You can probably make it easier by adding
a sleep inside the actual __free_device() func.

So the page cache is stale and this isn't related to any of our patches.

close_ctree() calls into btrfs_close_devices(), which calls
btrfs_close_one_device(), which uses:

call_rcu(&device->rcu, free_device);

close_ctree() also does an rcu_barrier() to make sure and wait for
free_device() to finish.

But, free_device() just puts the work into schedule_work(), so we don't
know for sure the blkdev_put is done when we exit.

Right, saw that before. Any idea why its like that ? Or if it
should be fixed?

It's just trying to limit the work that is done from call_rcu, and it should
definitely be fixed.  It might cause EBUSY or other problems.  Probably
easiest to add a counter or completion object that gets changed by the
__free_device function.

-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to