Looks fine, but can't we also remove the workaround at the end of the the test as well? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] tests: don't put loop contro... Christoph Hellwig
- [PATCH 3/7] xfs: test copy-on-write leftover recovery Darrick J. Wong
- Re: [PATCH 3/7] xfs: test copy-on-write leftover re... Christoph Hellwig
- [PATCH 4/7] xfs: test per-ag allocation accounting durin... Darrick J. Wong
- Re: [PATCH 4/7] xfs: test per-ag allocation account... Christoph Hellwig
- [PATCH 5/7] reflink: test interaction with swap files Darrick J. Wong
- Re: [PATCH 5/7] reflink: test interaction with swap... Christoph Hellwig
- [PATCH 7/7] reflink: test changing sharers of a block wh... Darrick J. Wong
- Re: [PATCH 7/7] reflink: test changing sharers of a... Christoph Hellwig
- [PATCH 8/7] xfs/122: don't break on old xfsprogs Darrick J. Wong
- Re: [PATCH 8/7] xfs/122: don't break on old xfsprog... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [PATCH 8/7] xfs/122: don't break on old xfs... Darrick J. Wong
- [PATCH v2 8/7] xfs/122: don't break on old xfsprogs Darrick J. Wong
- Re: [PATCH v2 8/7] xfs/122: don't break on old ... Christoph Hellwig