On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 04:29:43PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> New convert doesn't insert holes for superblock migration range.
> 
> Unlike old design, which only relocate 4K(superblock size) to other
> places.
> In new design, to make sure convert can handle different page size and
> align chunk bytenr, we relocate the whole 64K range.

This looks like a potential backward compatibility problem. In the
unlikely scenario, mixing old and new convert to do conversion and
rollback. Did you try that?

> And if there is only a 4K used block inside 64K superblock migration range, it
> will make converted fs has discontinuous file extents.
> 
> This patch will fix it by inserting needed holes to avoid such
> discontinuous error.
> 
> Reported-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-i...@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> David, I'm very sorry, all these recently exposed bugs are related to
> superblock migration range, and will only be triggered by special build
> ext* images(Needs special space range be allocated in ext*)
> 
> I'll try my best to create the minimal trigger e2image dump, our current
> image is too large for test cases.

Well, given the amount of last minute fixes I'm now hesitant to do 4.6
release with this patchset.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to