On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:21:07AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > It seems the initial support for low memory mode will come in recent > release, it's better to add more explanation on the unsupported > functions, to avoid user reporting known bugs. > > Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > Documentation/btrfs-check.asciidoc | 9 ++++++++- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/btrfs-check.asciidoc > b/Documentation/btrfs-check.asciidoc > index 4e27863..6b09662 100644 > --- a/Documentation/btrfs-check.asciidoc > +++ b/Documentation/btrfs-check.asciidoc > @@ -97,7 +97,14 @@ NOTE: Do not use unless you know what you're doing. > check fs in low memory usage mode(experimental) > May takes longer time than normal check. > + > -NOTE: Doesn't work with '--repair' option yet. > +[NOTE] > +========================== > +As this feature is still under development, some functions are not > implemented > +yet > + > +- No support for '--repair' yet. > +- Only reduce memory usage of extent tree check. No effect for fs tree yet. > +==========================
The help text is too short to be useful, I'd like to see something more comprehensive so the user knows what the low-mem mode does compared to the current state. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html