On Thu, 2 Jun 2016, Filipe Manana wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Yauhen Kharuzhy
<yauhen.kharu...@zavadatar.com> wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:43:47AM +0100, Filipe Manana wrote:
Hi Filipe,
Hi Scott,
Does your recent patch set (from May 20) address all of these issues?
Yes.
Tested, RAID5/6 still produces a plenty of 'failed to rebuild valid
logical NNNNNN" messages after two consecutive device replaces. So,
replace is still not usable for RAID5/6. And it is very slow in
comparison with 'device add && balance device remove missing' sequence
(4x slower).
Right. There's missing code for raid5/6 I believe. I didn't care about
that, nor will in the near future at least.
The set of problems I tried to solve were generic and unrelated to any
specific raid mode.
Back to your original question, then...should replace be disabled for
raid5/6 until it is fixed?
Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
