On Friday, July 15, 2016 11:44:06 AM David Sterba wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 11:47:07AM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 14, 2016 02:29:32 PM David Sterba wrote:
> > > The calculation of extent_buffer::pages size was done for 4k PAGE_SIZE,
> > > but this wastes 15 unused pointers on arches with large page size. Eg.
> > > on ppc64 this gives 15 * 8 = 120 bytes.
> > >
> > 
> > The non PAGE_SIZE aligned extent buffer usage in page straddling tests in
> > test_eb_bitmaps() need atleast one more page. So how about the following ...
> > 
> > #define INLINE_EXTENT_BUFFER_PAGES    (BTRFS_MAX_METADATA_BLOCKSIZE / 
> > PAGE_SIZE + 1)
> 
> Could the extra page pointer be normally used? Ie. not just for the sake
> of the tests. I'd rather not waste the bytes. As a compromise, we can do +1
> only if the tests are compiled in.
> 

I don't see any other scenario where the extra page pointer gets used. Also, I
just executed fstests with your patch applied and disabling self-tests from
the kernel configuration. The tests ran fine.

-- 
chandan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to