On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 11:27:19PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:46:54PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Run xfs_repair twice at the end of each test -- once to rebuild > > the btree indices, and again with -n to check the rebuild work. > > This looks fine to me in general, but shouldn't we have specific > tests that test the rebuilding in a normal auto run?
We do have specific tests that examine the outputs of rebuilding the indices (all the fuzzer group tests do this too); this patch enables a test runner to expand that coverage to all tests. Running a rebuilding xfs_repair for all the tests shook out some bugs in the xfs_repair rmap handling code that only triggered under some of the non-rmap non-reflink stressor tests. --D -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
