When we're not able to get enough space through splitting leaf,
we'd create a new sibling leaf instead, and it's possible that we return
 a zero-nritem sibling leaf and mark it dirty before it's in a consistent
state.  With CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_CHECK_INTEGRITY=y, the integrity check of
check_leaf will report panic due to this zero-nritem non-root leaf.

This removes the unnecessary btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty.

Reported-by: Filipe Manana <fdman...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li....@oracle.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
index d1c56c9..5e5ceb5 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
@@ -4341,7 +4341,11 @@ again:
                        if (path->slots[1] == 0)
                                fixup_low_keys(fs_info, path, &disk_key, 1);
                }
-               btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(right);
+               /*
+                * We create a new leaf 'right' for the required ins_len and
+                * we'll do btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() on this leaf after copying
+                * the content of ins_len to 'right'.
+                */
                return ret;
        }
 
-- 
2.5.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to