On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 08:44:58AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > > At 09/30/2016 01:19 AM, David Sterba wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 10:54:19AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > >> Commit 93dabf211d74daf6e3de642bdd887a90a00f7b49 > >> Author: Mark Fasheh <mfas...@suse.de> > >> Date: Fri Jun 17 13:37:48 2016 -0700 > >> > >> btrfs-progs: check: verify qgroups above level 0 > >> > >> This commit introduced a new regression which corrupts > >> read_qgroup_status, since it iterate leaf with manually specified slot, > >> not correct path->slot[0]. > >> > >> This leads to wrong slot[0] and read_qgroup_status() will read out wrong > >> flags, leading to regression. > >> > >> Fix read_qgroup_status() by using eb and slot instread of wrong path > >> strucutre. > >> > >> Reported-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-i...@jp.fujitsu.com> > >> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfas...@suse.de> > >> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com> > > > > I'm adding this patch to devel. Do you have a test for the regression > > please? > > > > > Xfstests btrfs/114 can produce it.
Good. > If you mean to add btrfs-progs test case, then I can try to create a > minimal image to reproduce it. Yes please. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
