Hi Eryu Guan,
Yes, it need apply
[PATCH] "Btrfs: incremental send, do not skip generation inconsistency
check for inode 256."
and test again, it will failed.
because current code there is a problem, but just will not happen.
Thansk
Robbie Ko
Eryu Guan 於 2016-11-01 15:20 寫到:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 09:44:06AM +0800, robbieko wrote:
From: Robbie Ko <robbi...@synology.com>
Test that an incremental send operation dosen't work because
it tries to rename a directory which is already deleted.
This test exercises scenarios used to fail in btrfs and are fixed by
the following patch for the linux kernel:
"Btrfs: incremental send, add generation check for inode is waiting
for move."
I was testing with v4.9-rc1+ kernel and btrfs-progs v4.6. Seems above
patch is not merged in 4.9-rc1 kernel, but test passed for me, is that
expected?
Thanks,
Eryu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
